Skip to content
Bullishmedium conviction · 3 yearsActive · reviewed today$VST$138.37Fri 30 Oct

Vistra: the power is contracted, the price is the question

By MenFem Editorial·Energy — Power generation·4 November 2026·Methodology·
ai-infrastructureenergypower
The next review, the day it is written.
Share

Price since the call

$138.37−0.0% since opened

Entered at $138.37, the close on 4 Nov; last close 30 Oct. The grade comes from the falsifier, never this number.

What would prove this wrong · verbatim, as published

The reason for holding this stops being true if the earnings do not arrive: Vistra's first 2027 guidance for Ongoing Operations Adjusted EBITDA coming in below $7.4B, the bottom of the 'opportunity' range it has published. It also stops being true if the contracts weaken: the Meta or Amazon agreement being cut, delayed past its start or terminated. And it stops being true if leverage outruns the earnings: net debt above 3.5 times adjusted EBITDA at any year-end through 2028.
  • leg 1 · First 2027 Adjusted EBITDA guidance below $7.4B · not read yet
  • leg 2 · The Meta or Amazon agreement cut, delayed past its start or terminated · not read yet
  • leg 3 · Net debt above 3.5x adjusted EBITDA at any year-end through 2028 · not read yet

Scrub the call’s life

week ending 30 Oct · close 138.37 · −0.0% since openedNo review yet by this week.

The argument, taken apart

Turn it, hover a ring, a moon or a weight
One call, taken apart
Rings are the falsifier’s legs. Moons are the catalysts it named. Weights are its risks, longer for higher severity.
The claim

A large US generator with 20-year datacentre deals and nuclear it already owns. Bullish on owning the scarce input; the open question is what the contracts pay.

What would make it wrong · 3 legs
  1. Leg 1 · Not read yet
    First 2027 Adjusted EBITDA guidance below $7.4B
    Not read at a review yet.
  2. Leg 2 · Not read yet
    The Meta or Amazon agreement cut, delayed past its start or terminated
    Not read at a review yet.
  3. Leg 3 · Not read yet
    Net debt above 3.5x adjusted EBITDA at any year-end through 2028
    Not read at a review yet.
The window
4 Nov 2026 to 4 Nov 2029
0% gone · 1096 days left
next print 6 Nov 2026
The reviews
Not reviewed since it was published
  • Leg 1, not read yet: First 2027 Adjusted EBITDA guidance below $7.4B
  • Leg 2, not read yet: The Meta or Amazon agreement cut, delayed past its start or terminated
  • Leg 3, not read yet: Net debt above 3.5x adjusted EBITDA at any year-end through 2028
  • Q3 2026 results (6 Nov 2026)
  • Amazon deliveries from Comanche Peak
  • high severity: Leverage
  • medium severity: Contract prices undisclosed
  • medium severity: Texas demand

The timeline · 1 entry · newest firstreviews · notes · moves · the book

  1. 4 Nov 2026
    Opened

    Vistra: the power is contracted, the price is the question

Key Points

  • 20-year datacentre deals: Meta (2,600+ MW) and Amazon (1.2 GW from Comanche Peak, from 2027).
  • Q2 2026 Ongoing Ops Adjusted EBITDA $1.77B (+31%); 2026 guide $6.8–7.6B.
  • Owns both nuclear (~6.4 GW) and a large gas fleet — not a bet on one fuel.
  • Watch items: undisclosed deal prices, rising debt ($19.6B + new notes + Cogentrix).

If the binding constraint on AI has moved from chips to electrons, the companies that already own generation are on the right side of it. Vistra owns about 6.4 GW of nuclear, including Comanche Peak, alongside a large gas fleet and a retail business, and it has started selling that power to the hyperscalers on long terms: 20-year agreements with Meta for more than 2,600 MW and 1.2 GW to Amazon from Comanche Peak, delivering from 2027. Core earnings rose about 31% in the second quarter of 2026 to $1.77B, 2026 guidance is $6.8–7.6B of adjusted EBITDA, and the company points to $7.4–7.8B for 2027, which it is careful to say is not guidance. Its PJM capacity cleared at the cap, and a conditional DOE loan offer of up to $4.2B covers upgrades at three nuclear plants. The view is not that nuclear wins. MenFem resolved that call wrong on 4 November: gas, not nuclear, is taking most new datacentre power. Vistra owns both, which is part of the case. The questions are price and leverage. No hyperscaler deal price is public, so the premium is taken on trust. Long-term debt rose to $19.6B by June, $1.5B of notes followed in September, and the Cogentrix acquisition adds more. Management has also cut its Texas load-growth view to 4–6% and called much of the interconnection queue paper. BULLISH, conviction MEDIUM, three years: owning the scarce input, with the contracts and the leverage as the things to watch.

Bull Case

The datacentre contracts lock in premium prices for two decades, 2027 EBITDA lands at or above the $7.4–7.8B range, and free cash flow pays down the acquisition debt while buybacks continue.

Bear Case

What I'd have to believe for the other side: the premium is smaller than the story. Hyperscalers have options, from gas they build themselves to other generators, and a utility-like business carrying rising debt is priced as if every megawatt will be sold at a datacentre premium that nobody has been shown.

Catalysts

Q3 2026 results (6 Nov 2026)Earnings

Guidance for 2026 and 2027, the Cogentrix close, net debt.

Amazon deliveries from Comanche PeakOther

Deliveries begin in 2027.

Risk factors

LeverageHigh

Debt rising through acquisitions and new notes while buybacks continue.

Contract prices undisclosedMedium

The datacentre premium cannot be checked until prices or margins show in the filings.

Texas demandMedium

Management cut its Texas load-growth view; forward power prices for 2027 are lower.

Related Calls

Key Metrics

Q2 2026 adjusted EBITDA
$1.77B
2026 EBITDA guide
$6.8–7.6B
Long-term debt, 30 Jun 2026
$19.6B

Weekly closes

entry 138.37
See all Energy — Power generation calls