Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs)
Active FrontierPower Purchase Agreements (PPAs)
A Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) is a long-term contract in which an energy buyer agrees to purchase electricity from a generator at a fixed or structured price over a defined period (typically 15–25 years). For the AI buildout, PPAs are the mechanism by which hyperscalers lock in reliable, carbon-free power at predictable prices — insulating them from spot-market volatility while providing the financing certainty that enables large capital projects (nuclear restarts, SMR construction).
The structure matters enormously. A financial PPA (virtual PPA / VPPA) hedges electricity costs but delivers no actual electrons — the buyer still takes power from the grid and gets renewable energy credits. A physical PPA actually delivers the contracted electrons. Hyperscalers with 24/7 reliability requirements are increasingly demanding physical PPAs from always-on sources (nuclear, gas), not virtual PPAs from intermittent renewables.
The nuclear PPA wave that emerged in 2023-2026 is qualitatively different from the 2010-2020 renewable PPA wave: longer terms (20 years vs 10-15), higher prices ($80-120/MWh vs $30-45/MWh for solar), and paired with co-location agreements or direct datacenter siting to minimize transmission costs and losses.
Key Claims
- 13 nuclear datacenter deals announced as of May 2026, committing 9.8 GW of nuclear capacity. Evidence: strong (SMRIntel nuclear data center deals tracker)
- Every major hyperscaler has signed at least one nuclear PPA. Evidence: strong (press releases: Microsoft/Constellation, Amazon/Talen, Google/Kairos, Meta/Constellation)
- Corporate renewable PPAs hit 46 GW globally in 2024, with hyperscalers = 76%. Evidence: strong (South Pole 2026 PPA Buyers Guide)
- Solar PPA prices: $30–45/MWh (US 2025); nuclear PPAs estimated $80–120/MWh — premium reflects 24/7 reliability. Evidence: moderate
- Microsoft signed a 20-year PPA with Constellation for all output from Crane Clean Energy Center (835 MW) — first nuclear restart driven by tech demand. Evidence: strong (Utility Dive, Bloomberg)
- Vistra signed 20-yr PPA with AWS for 1,200 MW at Comanche Peak; Meta for ~2,600 MW at PJM nuclear sites. Evidence: strong (Vistra Q1 2026 earnings release)
- Constellation↔Microsoft (Sep 2023): 20-year PPA to restart Three Mile Island Unit 1 (Pennsylvania) — the anchor deal of the procurement rush. Evidence: moderate (multi-source synthesis, hyperscaler-nuclear-procurement)
- Google↔Kairos Power (Aug 2025) was the first corporate SMR PPA: Hermes 2 (Oak Ridge) supplying 50 MW by 2030, scaling to 500 MW. Evidence: moderate (multi-source synthesis, hyperscaler-nuclear-procurement)
- Meta↔Vistra/Oklo/TerraPower (2026): up to 6.6 GW of nuclear by 2035 — spanning Vistra existing plants (2.2 GW + 433 MW upgrades, 8-yr window), Oklo (1.2 GW, first reactors ~2030), and TerraPower (2.6 GW + 1.2 GW storage, two units online as soon as 2032). Neither Oklo nor TerraPower holds NRC construction permits yet. Evidence: weak (single news item, Latitude Media)
- The three procurement modes hyperscalers use: (1) restart existing plants, (2) first corporate SMR PPAs, (3) multi-GW advanced-reactor development deals. Evidence: moderate (multi-source synthesis, hyperscaler-nuclear-procurement)
Major Announced Nuclear Deals (as of June 2026)
| Buyer | Seller/Plant | MW | Type | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | Constellation / Crane (TMI restart) | 835 | physical, 20yr | 2027 |
| Amazon | Talen Energy / Susquehanna campus | 960 | co-location | 2024 |
| Amazon | Various SMR contracts | TBD | physical | 2030+ |
| Kairos Power / Hermes 2 (first corp. SMR PPA, Aug 2025) | 50 → 500 | physical, fleet | 2030 | |
| X-energy Xe-100 | TBD | physical | 2030+ | |
| Meta | Constellation / Clinton Power | TBD | physical, 20yr | 2027 |
| Meta | Vistra / PJM nuclear sites | ~2,600 | physical | TBD |
| Meta | Oklo / Ohio campus | 1,200 | physical (advanced) | 2030 |
| Meta | TerraPower / Natrium + storage | 2,600 + 1,200 storage | physical (advanced) | 2032 |
| Microsoft | Helion Energy / Orion | ~50 | physical | 2028 |
| Commonwealth Fusion / ARC | 200 | physical | 2030s | |
| AWS | Vistra / Comanche Peak | 1,200 | physical, 20yr | TBD |
Meta's Vistra + Oklo + TerraPower legs together form the up-to-6.6 GW-by-2035 deal for the Prometheus supercluster (New Albany, OH). Latitude Media.
Open Questions
- What price is being paid in the nuclear PPAs? (Most are confidential; estimates range $80-120/MWh)
- How does FERC's interconnection reform affect whether nuclear PPA power can reach co-located or nearby datacenters?
- If SMR construction is delayed, do the Google/Amazon SMR contracts trigger termination clauses?
- Will European hyperscalers (Microsoft, Google EU) replicate the US nuclear PPA model?
Related Concepts
- Conventional Nuclear & Restarts — where the power comes from
- Datacenter Power Demand — the demand side driving the deals
- Baseload vs Intermittent — why nuclear preferred over renewables for these contracts
Changelog
- 2026-06-15 — Initial compilation from web research (SMRIntel, South Pole, Build.inc, press releases)
- 2026-06-24 — Compiled new sources (meta-66gw-nuclear-deal, hyperscaler-nuclear-procurement)
Related Concepts
Theses that depend on this concept
These research positions cite this concept in their evidence. If the concept changes materially, these theses may need re-scoring.